The supreme court will hear arguments on wednesday in king v. Supreme court on june 25, 2015, held 63 that consumers who purchase health insurance on an exchange marketplace run by the federal government under the patient protection and affordable care. The court of appeals for the fourth circuit affirmed. Burwell, announced monday, is the latest evidence of its slide toward paralysis. Supreme court of the united states david king, et al. The court held that congress did not delegate the authority to determine whether the tax credits are available through both statecreated and federally created exchanges to the internal revenue service, but the language of the statute clearly indicates that congress intended the tax credits to be available. Right now, the health insurance plans of millions of americans hang in the balance as the supreme court considers king v. Burwell, a lawsuit that contests the financial help available to some enrollees on the federal insurance exchanges in 34 states. But legal doctrines developed to protect the states against. Weve been waiting for years now, but the supreme court is finally poised to issue an opinion in king v. I have relocated the news mediablogsopinion section from a reference guide to the halbig cases to this post. The courts ruling is expected in the summer, and it could have a. Burwell and the triumph of selective contextualism 39 the aca differed from the house bill in at least one significant respect. The fourth circuit viewed the act as ambiguous and subject.
Total effectuated enrollment and financial assistance by state s t a t e t o t a l e n r o llm e n t f e d e r a l e x c h a n g e t o t a l 7,314,952. In summary, it is business as usual for the affordable care act. Burwell audio transcription for opinion announcement june 25, 2015 part 1 in king v. And it is especially unlikely that congress would have dele gated this decision to the irs, which has no expertise in crafting health insurance. Justice scalia filed a dissenting opinion, in which justices. Instead of challenging obamacares constitutionality, or. Supreme court upholds obamacare subsidies in siding with the administration in king v. Burwell means that the court, for the second time in three years, will be deciding an issue that will have a major impact on the obama administration. Indeed, the legal principle here is one of basic statutory construction i. Today, the supreme court issued its opinion in the king v. Readers are requested to notify the reporter of decisions, supreme court of the united states, washington, d.
The supreme court is expected to issue a decision in king v. Burwell case, in which the plaintiff argues that the aca prohibits payment of premium tax credits and costsharing reductions to people in states without statemanaged marketplaces. The plaintiffs in king appealed the decision to the united states court of appeals for the fourth circuit. Burwell, the latest highstakes litigation over the future of the affordable care act. Burwell, a challenge to the laws system of federal subsidies.
Judge gregory wrote the opinion, in which judge thackerand senior judge davis joined. Roberts and justice anthony kennedy joined the courts liberals. In her concurring opinion, justice sonia sotomayor wrote that nothing in the majority opinion should be construed as signaling to lower courts where the supreme court stands on the merits of the case. Burwell, the supreme court is considering whether the federal. Today, in a 6 to 3 decision authored by chief justice roberts, the supreme court determined that the patient protection and affordable care act aca extends tax.
Roberts, jr i have the opinion of the court in case number 14114 king v. This spring, the affordable care act will make its third trip to the supreme court. Read the best quotes from roberts and scalia in the king v. So opined six justices of the supreme court, including its most liberal members, in king v. In an opinion authored by chief justice roberts, the court held that tax credits are available to individuals in states that utilize a federallyfacilitated exchange. Sylvia matthews burwell, in her official capacity as u. Justice ginsburgs opinion for the court, which was unanimous on all but one point about citing legislative history to show the statutes purpose, not only didnt follow king v. Burwell, secretary of health and human services, et al. Later this month, the high court will issue a decision in king v. Implications for public health policy and practice. On writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fourth circuit brief of consumers research as amicus curiae in support of.
Burwell is a case argued before the supreme court on march 4, 2015 that questions whether the patient protection and affordable care act aca permits the federal government to provide financial assistance in the form of premium tax credits to individuals through the federally established health. Burwell opinion notes, studies predicted that premiums, both inside and outside of. The aca will, however, continue to be an issue in the runup to the 2016 elections. King v burwell supreme court decision business insider. We estimate that a victory for the plaintiff would increase the number of uninsured by 8. Weve simplified king v burwell, the obamacare subsidy lawsuit. Burwell, a case about the affordable care acts tax subsidies, in early march.
They would be exempt from obamacares coverage requirement if the price of buying health insurance cost more than 8 percent of their individual incomes. In the plaintiffs opinion, the irs violated the plain language of the law enacted by congress, which gave. Audio transcription for opinion announcement june 25, 2015 part 2 in king v. Millions of consumers across 34 states who rely on the subsidies to afford their health care insurance coverage will keep. This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the preliminary print of the united states reports. Dissenting opinion scalia petitioner david king, et al. Remanding the case allows the lower courts to consider whether the existing or modified regulations may properly balance the interests at issue. The courts decision upheld, as consistent with the statute, the outlay of premium tax credits to qualifying persons in all states, both those with exchanges established directly by a state, and those otherwise. Sebelius challenged an irs regulation imposed under the affordable care act, better known as obamacare, that allows subsidies on both state and federallyestablished health insurance exchanges. Burwell and congressional standing to sue congressional research service summary on november 21, 2014, the house of representatives filed a lawsuit against the departments of health and human services and the treasury, pursuant to h. Burwell were four residents of virginia who did not want to purchase health insurance. The supreme court opined in a 63 decision that the irc section 36b premium assistance tax credit is available both in marketplaces established by the state and by the federal government.
The petitioners challenged the legality of premium and costsharing subsidies for low and. Respondent sylvia mathews burwell, secretary of health and human services, et al. Burwell, the latest supreme court challenge to the affordable care act, could create. Supreme court ruled on june 25, 2015 in the king v.
Supreme court upholds obamacare subsidies in king v. Supporters of the affordable care act react with cheers as the opinion for health care is reported outside of the supreme court in. We explain the supreme court case, its history, ideology, and outcome in simple terms. According to roberts, because the phrase an exchange established by the state is ambiguous as it relates to tax credits, the court. On march 4, 2015, the supreme court heard arguments in the king v. Burwell audio transcription for oral argument march 04, 2015 in king v. Burwell argue that they should prevail based on federalism considerations.
Defenders of the federal governments position in king v. Burwell, the chief justice hands the obama administration a victory and justice scalia two losses. Burwell, four virginia residents are a challenging an irs obamacare rule. Burwell, the justices deal a blow to opponents of the affordable care act. The length of this section made that original post a beast to download. Burwell is a major victory for individuals seeking affordable health care coverage. Burwell, in her official capacity as secretary of health and human services. Yes, its important because it impacts millions of people and billions of dollars, but its unparalleled. King v burwell was a lawsuit heard by the supreme court in 2015. That is, unfortunately, the best thing about the majority opinion, which labors mightily to. Burwell is important not because of the legal principles behind it, but more because it was a win for supporters of the aca. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the court but has been prepared by the reporter of decisions for the convenience of the reader.
330 1452 991 549 894 42 1413 878 1554 950 1489 1310 1612 1054 1063 1101 1647 1018 1519 1547 695 49 938 1532 1515 682 96 1340 579 842 1151 1079 528 1361 259 1378 928 969 532 1375 66 373 41